Search SCOTUSblog

Type to search articles, cases, and authors.

Press ↵ to view all results.

Skip to main content

November 2007 Archive

Showing 1–50 of 109 items published in November 2007, most recent first.

New Filing in Ali v. Achim

On Wednesday, we filed this brief on behalf of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees as Amicus Curiae in support of the Petitioner in the case of Ali v. Achim, 06-1346. No argument date has been set, but the case will likely be argued in the February sitting.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 30, 2007

“Ask the Author”: Richard Lazarus, Part III

This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.

ByDavid Stras/Nov 30, 2007

Proposed DOJ regulation would resolve immigration question in Dada

In a move with potential consequences for the pending case Dada v. Mukasey (06-1181), the Justice Department earlier today published a proposed regulation that, if adopted, would resolve the precise question at issue – i.e. whether the time in which a noncitizen must leave the country under an order of voluntary departure should automatically toll upon the filing of a motion to reopen removal proceedings.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 30, 2007

Preparing for the Detainee Cases

The Supreme Court next Wednesday will hold a one-hour hearing on the legal rights of the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This will be the Court’s fourth full-scale review of legal questions arising out of the Bush Administration’s policy against terrorism, and the continuing legal controversy has grown increasingly complex.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 30, 2007

“Ask the Author”: Richard Lazarus, Part II

This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.

ByDavid Stras/Nov 29, 2007

Academic Round-Up

The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Penumbra currently features an online debate between Professors Bradley Smith (Capital University Law School) and Edward Foley (Moritz College of Law-Ohio State University) on voter identification requirements and Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, see here.

ByDavid Stras/Nov 29, 2007

Today at the Supreme Court | 11.28.07

At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Assn. (06-457), asking whether the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act preempts a Maine state law meant to block the delivery of tobacco purchased over the Internet to teenagers.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 28, 2007

New layer of dispute on arbitration

New briefs filed after the Supreme Court had heard argument in a significant case on federal judges’ power to second-guess arbitrators’ awards have opened up a new layer of dispute, potentially complicating the Court’s coming decision.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 28, 2007

“Ask the Author”: Richard Lazarus, Part I

This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.

ByDavid Stras/Nov 28, 2007

Massive apartheid case on way to the Court

A massive group of lawsuits, seeking upwards of $400 billion in damages from corporations located in the U.S., Canada and Europe, is on its way to the Supreme Court, surrounded by an intriguing question: has the Court already indicated that the case should not proceed?

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 28, 2007

Argument recap: Rowe v. NH Motor Transport

The opening moments of the oral argument for petitioner covered familiar ground from the briefs—the argument that one section of the Maine law regulates only retailers, and is thus only indirectly related to carrier services; congressional intent with regard to Morales and broad preemption; the

BySCOTUSblog Staff/Nov 28, 2007

Today at the Supreme Court | 11.27.07

At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286), asking whether fees paid to financial advisers are fully deductible from the income of a trust or estate.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 27, 2007

Early release of tapes of detainee cases

The Supreme Court will release promptly the audiotape of the oral argument on Wednesday, Dec. 5, in the two cases testing the legal rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (Boumediene v. Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. U.S., 06-1196).

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 27, 2007

Today’s Transcripts

The transcript of today’s argument in Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286) is now available here. The transcript of today’s argument in New Jersey v. Delaware (134 Original) is now available here.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 27, 2007

Argument recap: Knight v. CIR

At oral argument on Tuesday, members of the Court suggested that Section 67(e) permits a trust to deduct fees for investment advice that is related to trust status, but does not allow the trust to deduct fees for advice that is indistinguishable from advice sought by individuals.

BySCOTUSblog Staff/Nov 27, 2007

Today at the Supreme Court | 11.26.07

At 10 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Larue v. DeWolff (06-856), asking whether ERISA provides private causes of action for plan participants alleging fiduciary breaches.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 26, 2007

Court will not review welfare searches

UPDATED to 10:45 a.m. The Supreme Court on Monday turned aside an appeal by six welfare recipients in San Diego, seeking to challenge the constitutionality of a requirement that all applicants for public assistance allow a search of their homes as a condition for eligibility.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 26, 2007

Conference Call: Boehner-McDermott suit back before Justices

The following column, featuring a selected petition up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference on November 30, appears in today’s edition of Legal Times (available to subscribers here). To see the full list of “petitions to watch” for Friday’s conference, click here.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 26, 2007

The Week Ahead

On Monday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Larue v. DeWolff (06-856), asking whether ERISA provides private causes of action for plan participants alleging fiduciary breaches.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 25, 2007

DC Guns Blog Round-Up

With so much commentary on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the DC Guns case yesterday (DC v. Heller), we thought we’d do a blog Round-Up here on the main scroll. As always, additional links are updated throughout the day on the far right sidebar.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 21, 2007

Petitions to Watch | Conference of 12.7.07

The latest edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference of December 7. As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court’s ‘paid’ docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 21, 2007

D.C. Guns Press Round-Up

Here’s a companion piece to Jason’s blog Round-Up; we’ve gathered together many of the news articles that cover the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the D.C. Guns case and included them below.

ByEliza Presson/Nov 21, 2007

Today at the Supreme Court | 11.20.07

At 10 a.m., the Justices are expected to hold a private conference, orders from which could be released this afternoon in the event the Court grants certiorari in any cases up for consideration. Either way, we will provide coverage as soon we receive word.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 20, 2007

Court agrees to rule on gun case

FINAL UPDATE 3:20 p.m. After a hiatus of 68 years, the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to rule on the meaning of the Second Amendment — the hotly contested part of the Constitution that guarantees “a right to keep and bear arms.” Not since 1939 has the Court heard a case directly testing the Amendment’s scope — and there is a debate about whether it actually decided anything in that earlier ruling.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 20, 2007

Today’s Orders

A copy of today’s orders – consisting of grants of certiorari in District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290) and Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. Brown (06-939), and a postponement of jurisdiction in Riley v. Kennedy (07-77) – is available here.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 20, 2007

The Week Ahead

On Tuesday, the Justices are scheduled to hold a private conference. (Click here for our list of petitions to watch.) Among the cases up for consideration are District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290) and a cross-petition, Parker v. District of Columbia (07-335), both stemming from the District’s handgun ban.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 19, 2007

Conference Call: Justices to Mull Labor Law Preemption Dispute

The following column, featuring a selected petition up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference on November 20, appears in today’s edition of Legal Times (available to subscribers here). To see the full list of “petitions to watch” for Tuesday’s conference, click here.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 19, 2007

The State of the Term

With the October and November argument calendars completed, I thought this would be a good time to update the State of the Term. Decisions. The Court has not issued any signed opinions from merits cases. Last Term at this point, the Justices had issued one signed opinion. The volume of cert grants.

ByTom Goldstein/Nov 19, 2007

Ask the Author: Christopher Eisgruber and The Next Justice, Part III

This is the final part of our newest installment in the Ask the Author series; Wednesdays Part I is here, and yesterday’s Part II is here. This edition features a conversation with Christopher Eisgruber about his new book, The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, which was released last week by Princeton University Press.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 16, 2007

State defends death penalty for child rape

Louisiana officials have urged the Supreme Court to allow the state to continue to seek the death penalty for those convicted of child rape. In a brief in opposition (found here) filed on Wednesday, the state argued that there is a distinct trend across the country to impose death sentences for crimes that do not result in death of any victim.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 16, 2007

January arguments, day by day

The Supreme Court will open its January sitting with the argument on constitutional issues surrounding the lethal injection method of execution. The Court on Friday released the calendar for the session beginning Jan. 7, with Baze v. Rees (07-5439) scheduled at 10 a.m. that first day.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 16, 2007

New issues raised in Hall Street

The Supreme Court on Friday morning released this order directing the parties in Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel (06-989) to file supplemental briefs on three issues. More on this case can be found here at SCOTUSwiki.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 16, 2007

Ask the Author: Christopher Eisgruber and The Next Justice, Part II

This is Part II of our newest installment in the Ask the Author series; yesterday’s Part I is here. This edition features a conversation with Christopher Eisgruber about his new book, The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, which was released last week by Princeton University Press.

ByJason Harrow/Nov 15, 2007

UPDATE: Florida execution put on hold

UPDATE 2:15 P.M. The Supreme Court Thursday ordered a delay in the planned execution Thursday evening of Florida death row inmate Mark Dean Schwab. The order (found here) is keyed to the coming petition for review in Schwab’s case: if the Court agrees to hear it, the stay will remain in effect; if not, the stay will dissolve immediately, according to the order.

ByLyle Denniston/Nov 15, 2007

Petitions to Watch | Conference of 11.30.07

The latest edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference of November 30. As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court’s ‘paid’ docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.

ByBen Winograd/Nov 15, 2007

Welcome

Tell us a bit about yourself and choose what you’d like to hear from us. You can change any of it any time in your account.