Today at the Supreme Court | 11.30.07
The Justices are scheduled to hold a private conference today, orders from which are expected to be released on Monday. Click here to see our list of “petitions to watch.”
Showing 1–50 of 109 items published in November 2007, most recent first.
The Justices are scheduled to hold a private conference today, orders from which are expected to be released on Monday. Click here to see our list of “petitions to watch.”
On Wednesday, we filed this brief on behalf of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees as Amicus Curiae in support of the Petitioner in the case of Ali v. Achim, 06-1346. No argument date has been set, but the case will likely be argued in the February sitting.
This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.
In a move with potential consequences for the pending case Dada v. Mukasey (06-1181), the Justice Department earlier today published a proposed regulation that, if adopted, would resolve the precise question at issue – i.e. whether the time in which a noncitizen must leave the country under an order of voluntary departure should automatically toll upon the filing of a motion to reopen removal proceedings.
The Supreme Court next Wednesday will hold a one-hour hearing on the legal rights of the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This will be the Court’s fourth full-scale review of legal questions arising out of the Bush Administration’s policy against terrorism, and the continuing legal controversy has grown increasingly complex.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected today from the Court.
This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Penumbra currently features an online debate between Professors Bradley Smith (Capital University Law School) and Edward Foley (Moritz College of Law-Ohio State University) on voter identification requirements and Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, see here.
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Assn. (06-457), asking whether the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act preempts a Maine state law meant to block the delivery of tobacco purchased over the Internet to teenagers.
The transcript of today’s argument in Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Assn. (06-457) is now available here.
New briefs filed after the Supreme Court had heard argument in a significant case on federal judges’ power to second-guess arbitrators’ awards have opened up a new layer of dispute, potentially complicating the Court’s coming decision.
This edition of “Ask the Author” features a conversation with Richard Lazarus about his new article entitled, “Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar,” see here.
A massive group of lawsuits, seeking upwards of $400 billion in damages from corporations located in the U.S., Canada and Europe, is on its way to the Supreme Court, surrounded by an intriguing question: has the Court already indicated that the case should not proceed?
The opening moments of the oral argument for petitioner covered familiar ground from the briefs—the argument that one section of the Maine law regulates only retailers, and is thus only indirectly related to carrier services; congressional intent with regard to Morales and broad preemption; the
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286), asking whether fees paid to financial advisers are fully deductible from the income of a trust or estate.
The Supreme Court will release promptly the audiotape of the oral argument on Wednesday, Dec. 5, in the two cases testing the legal rights of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (Boumediene v. Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. U.S., 06-1196).
The transcript of today’s argument in Knight v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286) is now available here. The transcript of today’s argument in New Jersey v. Delaware (134 Original) is now available here.
At oral argument on Tuesday, members of the Court suggested that Section 67(e) permits a trust to deduct fees for investment advice that is related to trust status, but does not allow the trust to deduct fees for advice that is indistinguishable from advice sought by individuals.
Does the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 preempt state regulation of carriers that deliver shipments of tobacco and other products?
At 10 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Larue v. DeWolff (06-856), asking whether ERISA provides private causes of action for plan participants alleging fiduciary breaches.
UPDATED to 10:45 a.m. The Supreme Court on Monday turned aside an appeal by six welfare recipients in San Diego, seeking to challenge the constitutionality of a requirement that all applicants for public assistance allow a search of their homes as a condition for eligibility.
The following column, featuring a selected petition up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference on November 30, appears in today’s edition of Legal Times (available to subscribers here). To see the full list of “petitions to watch” for Friday’s conference, click here.
A copy of today’s orders is available here.
Note: The following argument recap is by Paul Secunda of the University of Mississippi School of Law and Workplace Prof Blog, where this entry is cross-posted. The SCOTUSwiki page for this case, with more links and documents, is here.
Argument Preview On November 27, 2007, the Supreme Court will hear Knight v. CIR.
On Monday, the Court is scheduled to hear argument in Larue v. DeWolff (06-856), asking whether ERISA provides private causes of action for plan participants alleging fiduciary breaches.
Two seasoned advocates at the Supreme Court’s bar will argue the cases testing the legal rights of Guantanamo Bay detainees, set for a one-hour hearing at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 5.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected to be released from the Court today.
The Court is closed today for Thanksgiving.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected to be released from the court today.
With so much commentary on the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the DC Guns case yesterday (DC v. Heller), we thought we’d do a blog Round-Up here on the main scroll. As always, additional links are updated throughout the day on the far right sidebar.
More than five years ago, on May 6, 2002, the U.S. government told the Supreme Court — for the first time — that it had changed its decades-long position on gun rights.
The latest edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference of December 7. As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court’s ‘paid’ docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.
Here’s a companion piece to Jason’s blog Round-Up; we’ve gathered together many of the news articles that cover the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the D.C. Guns case and included them below.
At 10 a.m., the Justices are expected to hold a private conference, orders from which could be released this afternoon in the event the Court grants certiorari in any cases up for consideration. Either way, we will provide coverage as soon we receive word.
FINAL UPDATE 3:20 p.m. After a hiatus of 68 years, the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to rule on the meaning of the Second Amendment — the hotly contested part of the Constitution that guarantees “a right to keep and bear arms.” Not since 1939 has the Court heard a case directly testing the Amendment’s scope — and there is a debate about whether it actually decided anything in that earlier ruling.
A copy of today’s orders – consisting of grants of certiorari in District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290) and Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. Brown (06-939), and a postponement of jurisdiction in Riley v. Kennedy (07-77) – is available here.
On Tuesday, the Justices are scheduled to hold a private conference. (Click here for our list of petitions to watch.) Among the cases up for consideration are District of Columbia v. Heller (07-290) and a cross-petition, Parker v. District of Columbia (07-335), both stemming from the District’s handgun ban.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected to be released from the Court today.
The following column, featuring a selected petition up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference on November 20, appears in today’s edition of Legal Times (available to subscribers here). To see the full list of “petitions to watch” for Tuesday’s conference, click here.
With the October and November argument calendars completed, I thought this would be a good time to update the State of the Term. Decisions. The Court has not issued any signed opinions from merits cases. Last Term at this point, the Justices had issued one signed opinion. The volume of cert grants.
This is the final part of our newest installment in the Ask the Author series; Wednesdays Part I is here, and yesterday’s Part II is here. This edition features a conversation with Christopher Eisgruber about his new book, The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, which was released last week by Princeton University Press.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected to be released from the Court today.
Louisiana officials have urged the Supreme Court to allow the state to continue to seek the death penalty for those convicted of child rape. In a brief in opposition (found here) filed on Wednesday, the state argued that there is a distinct trend across the country to impose death sentences for crimes that do not result in death of any victim.
The Supreme Court will open its January sitting with the argument on constitutional issues surrounding the lethal injection method of execution. The Court on Friday released the calendar for the session beginning Jan. 7, with Baze v. Rees (07-5439) scheduled at 10 a.m. that first day.
The Supreme Court on Friday morning released this order directing the parties in Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel (06-989) to file supplemental briefs on three issues. More on this case can be found here at SCOTUSwiki.
This is Part II of our newest installment in the Ask the Author series; yesterday’s Part I is here. This edition features a conversation with Christopher Eisgruber about his new book, The Next Justice: Repairing the Supreme Court Appointments Process, which was released last week by Princeton University Press.
No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders are expected to be released from the Court today.
UPDATE 2:15 P.M. The Supreme Court Thursday ordered a delay in the planned execution Thursday evening of Florida death row inmate Mark Dean Schwab. The order (found here) is keyed to the coming petition for review in Schwab’s case: if the Court agrees to hear it, the stay will remain in effect; if not, the stay will dissolve immediately, according to the order.
The latest edition of “Petitions to Watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ private conference of November 30. As always, the list reflects the petitions on the Court’s ‘paid’ docket that Tom has deemed to have a reasonable chance of being granted.