Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.
Holding
To determine whether an omission of a claim in the bankruptcy context was inadvertent or mistaken for purposes of the judicial estoppel doctrine, courts should look to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the omission; the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit erred in narrowing its inquiry in this case to whether the debtor had knowledge of the underlying facts or a potential motive to conceal the claim.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Ketanji Brown Jackson on Jun 11, 2026. Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justice Sotomayor wrote a concurring opinion.
Vote
Recommended Citation: Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/keathley-v-buddy-ayers-construction-inc/