Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar
Holding
(1) The implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act when a defendant submitting a claim makes specific representations about the goods or services provided, but fails to disclose non-compliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements that make those representations misleading with respect to those goods or services; and (2) liability under the FCA for failing to disclose violations of legal requirements does not turn upon whether those requirements were expressly designated as conditions of payment.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Clarence Thomas on Jun 16, 2016.
Recommended Citation: Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/universal-health-services-v-united-states-ex-rel-escobar/