Magwood v. Patterson
Holding
A state prisoner can often petition a federal court for a writ of habeas corpus, challenging her state court conviction or sentence. But she generally may not file a second or successive? application for habeas relief. In Magwood, the defendant prevailed on habeas and had his case sent back to the state courts for a new sentencing proceeding, After the state court imposed the same sentence again, he again sought federal habeas relief. This time, he raised a new argument that could have been in his initial application but was not. The Supreme Court held that when a state prisoner obtains federal habeas relief and is re-sentenced, a habeas application challenging the new judgment is not “second or successive,? even if the prisoner could have challenged the original sentence on the same ground.
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Clarence Thomas on Jun 24, 2010. Justice Kennedy dissented, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg and Alito.
Merits Briefs
- Brief for Petitioner Billy Joe Magwood
- Joint Appendix
- Brief for Respondent Tony Patterson
- Reply Brief for Petitioner Billy Joe Magwood
[edit] Amicus Briefs
[##CERT-STAGE##]
Recommended Citation: Magwood v. Patterson, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/magwood-v-patterson/