Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency
Application for stay granted on June 27, 2024. Justice Barrett wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.
Holding
The enforcement of the Environmental Protection Agency's federal implementation plan against the applicant states, whose own state implementation plans were determined by EPA to be inadequate because they failed to adequately address certain obligations under the Good Neighbor Provision, shall be stayed pending disposition of the applicants' petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and any petition for writ of certiorari, timely sought.
Judgment
Application for stay granted, 5-4, in an opinion by Neil Gorsuch on Jun 27, 2024. Justice Barrett wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.
Vote
Recommended Citation: Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/ohio-v-environmental-protection-agency/