Decided
Noem v. Perdomo
Application for stay of district court order granted on Sept. 8, 2025. Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.
Judgment
Application for stay granted, 6-3 on Sep 8, 2025. Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.
Vote
6
3
RobertsThomasAlitoGorsuchKavanaughBarrett
SotomayorKaganJackson
Related Coverage
Aug 7, 2025Application (25A169) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Aug 8, 2025Response to application (25A169) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 5 p.m. (EDT) on August 12, 2025.
Aug 12, 2025Response to application from respondent Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, et al. filed.Aug 12, 2025Brief amici curiae of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed.Aug 13, 2025Reply of applicant Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed.Aug 22, 2025Brief amicus curiae of Federation for American Immigration Reform filed.Sep 8, 2025Application (25A169) referred to the Court.
Sep 8, 2025Application (25A169) for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted. The July 11, 2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, case No. 2:25-cv-5605, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the Ninth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Kavanaugh, concurs (Detached Opinion ). Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson, dissent. (Detached Opinion )
Recommended Citation: Noem v. Perdomo, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/noem-v-perdomo/