The morning read for Tuesday, Dec. 31
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
Showing 1–50 of 56 items published in December 2024, most recent first.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
At the end of an eventful year at the Supreme Court that included a ruling giving former President Donald Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution for his conduct while in office, reporting that controversial flags had flown at the homes of Justice Samuel Alito, and an ethics inquiry from
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Biden administration on Friday afternoon urged the Supreme Court to leave in place a federal law that would require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its parent company can sell off the U.S. company by Jan. 19.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Thursday morning read: When could TikTok be banned? When is Supreme Court weighing in?
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: What Would the Founders Have Thought About TikTok and Online Porn?
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Petitions of the Week column highlights some of the cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. Many of us carry our entire lives with us on our cellphones.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Friday morning read: The Constitution Allows for Term-Limited Supreme Court Justices (Nancy Gertner, Brennan Center for Justice) Who Knocked on the Supreme Court’s Door in November?
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court will hear two hours of oral arguments on Jan. 10 in TikTok’s appeal to block enforcement of a federal law that would require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless its parent company can sell off the U.S. company by Jan. 19.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to take up a dispute over whether a South Carolina woman can bring a lawsuit challenging that state’s decision to end Planned Parenthood’s participation in its Medicaid program.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read: The Supreme Court just took up its first religion case of the year. It could add 6 more.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take up a challenge to New York’s caps on the price that its low-income residents pay for broadband internet access.
UPDATED: A group of TikTok users filed a separate application on Monday afternoon, also asking the court to block enforcement of the law. Social media giant TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, on Monday asked the justices to block a federal law that would require TikTok to shut down in the United States unless ByteDance can sell off the U.S. company by Jan. 19.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to review a decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejecting efforts by Catholic Charities to seek an exemption from the state’s unemployment tax.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
Members of the public who want to attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court can now apply through an online lottery to obtain advance reservations for seats at those arguments.
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. It’s been a big few days for the Supreme Court working through its backlog of relisted cases.
The justices showed little appetite for breaking new ground when they heard argument on Wednesday in Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers, a long-running dispute between similarly named groups of real-estate companies.
We expect one or more opinions from the court again this morning, beginning at 10 a.m. EST. Follow us on Bluesky and TikTok for live coverage. The justices will then hear oral arguments in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers, Inc. The case is a dispute over damages for trademark infringement.
At oral arguments on Monday it was not clear how the Supreme Court will rule in the case of a Philadelphia-area government contractor found guilty of fraud after it failed to comply with a contract provision intended to promote diversity.
The justices on Wednesday dismissed a dispute over a securities fraud case brought against graphics chip maker NVIDIA. Shareholders argued that NVIDIA did not disclose the extent to which sales to crypto-miners, rather than gaming companies, put their shares at risk.
William Hennessy, Jr., a classically trained artist and SCOTUSblog contributor who chronicled oral arguments at the Supreme Court and legal proceedings around the country for decades, died on Tuesday.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a request from a Kentucky utility company to temporarily block an Environmental Protection Agency rule governing the disposal of coal ash while a challenge to it moves forward in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The Supreme Court will issue one or more opinions from the current term this morning at 10 a.m. EST, followed by oral arguments in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado. Follow along for our live coverage.
In a long-running trademark dispute between two companies marketing real-estate development services, and both using the name Dewberry, a trial court held that Dewberry Group entities infringed the “Dewberry” marks of Dewberry Engineers.
The court will meet for oral arguments this morning in Kousisis v. U.S., a question about what constitutes wire fraud, and Feliciano v. Department of Transportation on differential pay for federal civilian employees called to active military duty during a national emergency.
The Supreme Court on Monday morning declined to take up several hot-button issues, including a challenge by parents to a school district’s plan to provide support for transgender and non-binary students, a dispute over the admissions policy used during the 2021-22 school year for three of Boston’s elite public high schools, and the case of a Hawaii man prosecuted for carrying a handgun without a license.
UPDATE Dec. 6: Plumbers Local has filed a motion to dismiss its petition for review in Plumbers Local #290 Pension Trust Fund v. Root, so the justices will not consider the case at their conference on Friday.
Follow us on Bluesky; we’ll have live updates as the court announces opinions on Tuesday, Dec. 10. Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Petitions of the Week column highlights some of the cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. The Sixth Amendment gives defendants in criminal trials the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against” them.
The Supreme Court on Friday afternoon agreed to decide whether a 2019 law that seeks to give U.S. courts the power to hear claims by victims of terrorism against the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority violates the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of fair treatment.
We are now officially on Bluesky. Follow us there for breaking news and updates on orders, arguments, and opinions. Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this morning in what could be one of the most significant cases of the term, a challenge to Tennessee’s ban on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teens. Twenty-four states have enacted similar laws in the past three years.
This article was updated on Dec. 4 at 4:43 p.m. During almost two-and-a-half hours of debate on Wednesday, nearly all of the court’s conservative majority expressed skepticism about a challenge to Tennessee’s ban on puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teenagers.
The biggest case of the term, so far, is being argued this morning and there is anticipation in the chilly Washington air. Demonstrators on each side of United States v. Skrmetti, the dispute over access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender teenagers, have arrived early in front of the court building and will still be there when the argument is finished after noon.
The justices will hear oral arguments this morning in Republic of Hungary v. Simon. The case involves a lawsuit brought by survivors of the Hungarian Holocaust and their heirs who sued Hungary and its national railway, MÁV, for compensation for property seized during the extermination campaign that killed over two-thirds of the country’s Jewish population.
Typically, in bankruptcy proceedings a creditor must return payments made shortly before the debtor filed for bankruptcy. At Monday’s argument in United States v. Miller, the justices were asked to decide whether that same rule applies to the Internal Revenue Service.