Thursday round-up
Oral arguments in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing and Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan; more on McComish v. Bennett and Wal-Mart v. Dukes.
Showing 1–50 of 122 items published in March 2011, most recent first.
Oral arguments in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing and Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan; more on McComish v. Bennett and Wal-Mart v. Dukes.
On March 29, the Court issued its opinion in Astra USA, Inc. v. County of Santa Clara, California
Eleventh Circuit refuses en banc review of the sweeping challenge to the new federal health care law by a group of states.
Oral argument in Wal-Mart, decisions in Connick, and Astra, and a DIG in Tolentino.
This morning, the Court will hear oral argument in the consolidated cases of Isiogu v. Michigan Bell, and Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell.
Predictions about Wal-Mart v. Dukes; assessing the Connick v. Thompson decision; and a traffic ticket for a Justice on his way to work
Transcripts of this morning’s oral arguments.
The Senate will consider Don Verrilli’s nomination to be Solicitor General.
This morning’s Live Blog will not appear on the homepage. To access the Live Blog, please click on this post.
More coverage of Wal-Mart v. Dukes and McComish v. Bennett; Court rejects Troy Davis innocence pleas
This morning, the Court issued opinions in two cases: Astra USA v. Santa Clara County and Connick v. Thompson. The Court also dismissed the writ of cert in Tolentino v. New York as improvidently granted.
The massive class-action lawsuit against discount retailer Wal-Mart lost momentum, and perhaps more than that, in the oral argument before the Court on claims of widespread sex bias against its female workers.
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases.
Transcripts of Tuesday morning’s oral arguments.
Wal-Mart v. Dukes is generating debate in advance of Tuesday’s oral argument.
The Court holds oral argument Tuesday on a massive class-action case over the workplace policies of the giant discount retailer, Wal-Mart Stores, and their impact on women employees.
Coverage of McComish v. Bennett and Wal-Mart v. Dukes.
Lisa McElroy discusses the cases argued and opinions issued last week by the Court.
The Court turns down, without explanation, all pleas by Georgia death-row inmate Troy Anthony Davis that he is innocent of a 1989 murder of an off-duty policeman.
Arizona’s 13-year-old system of providing public funds to subsidize candidates who forgo private contributions appears in serious constitutional jeopardy in an argument before the Court.
Transcripts of this morning’s oral arguments.
Significant dates in the coming weeks.
In Kasten v. Saint-Gobain the Court ruled that, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, an employee who made an oral complaint of FLSA violations could be protected from retaliation.
Professor Brooks Holland previews Fowler v. United States, which is scheduled for oral argument on March 29.
On Monday, the Court will hear oral argument in CSX Transportation v. McBride (10-235).
On Wednesday, the Court will hear oral argument in PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing (09-993).
The Court holds oral argument Monday on the constitutionality of Arizona’s system for using public funds to subsidize some state political candidates, a case with nationwide implications.
On Tuesday, March 22, the Court heard oral argument in Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (09-1476).
Next week’s arguments in McComish and Wal-Mart; coverage of this week’s argument in Turner
Ross Guberman, the President of Legal Writing Pro, discusses his new book, Point Made: How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates.
On Tuesday, the Court issued its decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano (09-1156).
Yesterday’s arguments in Turner and J.D.B.; more on Tuesday’s opinions.
On Monday, the Court heard oral argument in Tolentino v. New York.
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Fox v. Vice (No. 10-114).
Decisions about securities fraud and retaliation; coverage of yesterday’s and today’s oral arguments
From the edge of a rhetorical slippery slope, and then back from it, the Court explores what would happen to Miranda rights in the future if they were to be extended to minors facing police questioning.
Transcripts of this morning’s oral arguments.
A Ninth Circuit Court panel refuses to set aside a temporary order that blocks same-sex couples from marrying in California. A federal judge’s ruling striking down Proposition 8 remains on hold.
This morning, the Court will hear oral argument in Fox v. Vice (10-114).
The Court turns aside the first attempt to block disclosure of the Fed’s emergency lending to big banks during the financial crisis of 2007-2008.
This morning’s Live Blog will not appear on the homepage. To access the Live Blog, please click on this post.
Today, the Court will hear arguments in Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Covering yesterday’s grants, notable denials, oral arguments, and a per curiam decision
The state of Virginia renews its plea to the Court to decide the constitutionality of the new health care law without waiting for federal appeals courts to do so. The case could go to Conference as soon as April 15.
Matrixx Initiatives v. Siracusano and Kasten v. Saint-Gobain
The Court holds oral argument Wednesday on the issue of Miranda warnings for minors when questioned about crime by a police officer in a school conference room, behind a closed door.
On March 23, the Court will hear oral argument in Turner v. Rogers (No. 10-10).
Transcripts of this morning’s oral arguments.
Today’s cases; more on business and the Roberts Court; and Emily Bazelon on Justice Alito.